ICQs & CCQs — Checking Questions in ELT

ABC English Online — Teacher Resource

ICQs & CCQs

The art of checking understanding — why “Do you understand?” is the wrong question, and what to ask instead.

Why Checking Matters

The invisible problem at the heart of every lesson — and the two tools that make it visible.

The Central Problem

A student who does not understand will rarely say so. Social pressure, embarrassment, and the desire to please the teacher all conspire to produce the same response: a nod, a smile, or a quiet “yes.” Without active checking strategies, this gap remains invisible until it surfaces in an assignment — or never at all. Effective teachers engineer situations where comprehension becomes visible.

The two main tools for doing this are Instruction Checking Questions (ICQs) and Concept Checking Questions (CCQs). They serve different purposes, are used at different moments, and are designed in different ways.

ICQ — Instruction Check

  • Checks that students understand what to do
  • Used before an activity begins
  • Targets task logistics: who, what, how long, with whom
  • Prevents wasted time on a misunderstood task

CCQ — Concept Check

  • Checks that students understand language meaning
  • Used after presenting vocabulary, grammar, or a function
  • Targets meaning, form, or appropriacy
  • Prevents building further learning on a shaky foundation
The Problem with “Do you understand?”

This question is well-intentioned but almost useless. It is a yes/no question with a social default answer of “yes.” Studies in ELT practice consistently identify this as one of the most common yet least effective checking strategies.

Similarly ineffective: “Does that make sense?” / “Are you ready?” / “OK?” / “Got it?”

Instruction Checking Questions

Making sure every student knows exactly what they are about to do — before they start.

An ICQ is a short, closed question targeted at the most likely point of confusion in an instruction. It reveals immediately whether the class is ready to proceed.

What to Check

Who

Solo, pairs, groups, or whole class?

“Are you working alone or with a partner?”

What

Writing, speaking, reading, listening?

“Are you writing sentences or just notes?”

Order / Steps

Multi-step tasks need sequencing.

“Do you read the text first, or write first?”

How Long

Students pace themselves differently with time pressure.

“How many minutes do you have?”

Worked Examples

Activity: Information Gap — Pair Speaking
Students A and B have different halves of a schedule. No looking at each other’s sheets.
“OK, does everyone understand? Ready? Go.”
“Are you talking or writing right now?”
“Can you look at your partner’s paper?”
“Who starts — Student A or Student B?”
Activity: Listening — Multiple Choice
Students listen once, choose A/B/C for three questions, then compare with a partner.
“Listen and answer the questions.”
“How many times will you hear it?” — Once.
“Do you discuss with your partner before or after listening?” — After.

Concept Checking Questions

Confirming that language meaning — not just sound — has been grasped.

The Fundamental Challenge

Students can repeat a word or sentence perfectly without having any idea what it means. A CCQ probes below the surface form to test whether the meaning, use, or implication of a language item has actually been understood.

CCQs for Vocabulary

Word: borrow
“If I borrow your pen, do I keep it?”
“Do I give it back?”
“Do I pay for it?”
Word: exhausted
“Am I a little tired, or very tired?”
“Do I want to sleep, or do I want to exercise?”

CCQs for Grammar

Structure: Present Perfect — “She has lived in Paris.”
“Does she live in Paris now?”
“Do we know exactly when she moved there?”
“Is this about the past, the present, or both?”
Structure: Second Conditional — “If I won the lottery, I would travel.”
“Did I win the lottery?”
“Is it likely that I will win?”
“Am I talking about a real plan or an imaginary one?”

CCQs for Functions & Pragmatics

Phrase: “Would you mind closing the window?”
“Is this polite or rude?”
“Am I demanding or requesting?”
“If they say ‘No, not at all,’ do they close the window or not?”

How to Write Effective CCQs

Six principles that separate useful questions from unhelpful ones.

1

Never use the target word or structure in the question

A CCQ for “exhausted” should not contain “exhausted.” Replace the target item with simpler synonyms or contextual descriptions.

2

Use language well below the level of the target item

If your CCQ requires advanced vocabulary to understand, you have added a second unknown. Use the simplest language possible.

3

Require a short, specific answer

Yes/no, a number, a single word, or a choice between two options. Short answers either confirm comprehension or reveal the gap immediately.

4

Check the right feature, not the obvious one

For “borrow,” the key feature is return, not cost. Identify what is pedagogically critical and target that.

5

Sequence from easier to harder

Start with a question students can almost certainly answer, then narrow in on the trickier distinction. Two or three questions is usually optimal.

6

Prepare them in advance — not on the spot

CCQs designed in the moment tend to be poor. Write your CCQs during lesson planning, when you have time to think about the concept clearly.

“The art of the CCQ is to find the simplest question whose answer could only be given correctly by someone who understood the concept.”
Principle of targeted checking

In Practice

Techniques for delivering checks naturally and reading student responses well.

Wait Time

Mary Budd Rowe’s landmark research (1986) found that most teachers wait less than one second after asking a question. Extending wait time to 3–7 seconds produced striking improvements in the quality and length of student responses.

Rowe’s Findings on Extended Wait Time

Students gave longer, more complete answers · More students participated · Responses showed higher-order thinking · Fewer “I don’t know” responses · Students asked more questions themselves.

Nomination

Ask the question first, then nominate: “Does she still live in Paris?…María?” This gives all students a moment to process.

Reading Responses

  • Ask the class — “What do others think?” Peer correction is less threatening.
  • Return to the context — Reconnect to the concrete anchor.
  • Use a different CCQ — Approach the concept from a different direction before re-presenting.

Beyond Oral Checking

Mini whiteboards or show-of-hands

Students write or hold up answers simultaneously — the teacher sees the whole class response at once. Particularly effective for binary yes/no CCQs.

Traffic light cards

Green (understood), amber (partially), red (confused). Requires a classroom culture where honesty about confusion is normal and safe.

Concept mapping

After presenting a lexical set or grammar structure, students draw or complete a diagram showing relationships between items. Reveals the full shape of a student’s understanding.

Related Ideas & Broader Context

Where ICQs and CCQs sit within the wider landscape of responsive teaching.

Eliciting

Eliciting is drawing knowledge out of students rather than telling them. Related to CCQs but distinct: eliciting happens before presentation to find out what students already know; CCQs happen after to confirm what has been learned.


The IRF Pattern

The Initiation–Response–Feedback pattern (Sinclair & Coulthard, 1975): teacher initiates (I), student responds (R), teacher evaluates (F). Both ICQs and CCQs operate within this pattern.


Display vs. Referential Questions

Christine Brock (1986) distinguished display questions (teacher already knows the answer) from referential questions (genuine requests for information). Research shows referential questions produce longer, more complex responses.


Formative Assessment

CCQs are a form of formative assessment. Black & Wiliam’s influential meta-analysis (1998) found that effective formative assessment has among the highest effect sizes of any educational intervention.

Sources
Black & Wiliam (1998) Inside the Black Box. King’s College London.
Brock (1986) Referential questions on ESL discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 47–59.
Rowe (1986) Wait time. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 43–50.
Sinclair & Coulthard (1975) Towards an Analysis of Discourse. OUP.

Common Pitfalls

What goes wrong, and how to avoid it.

Using the target word in the CCQ

“If someone is exhausted, are they very exhausted or just a little exhausted?” — this confirms nothing about meaning. Replace with: “Do they have much energy, or very little?”

Asking a question that has no wrong answer

“So ‘borrow’ is a useful word, isn’t it?” — anyone can answer yes regardless of understanding. A CCQ must have a wrong answer.

Calling on the same confident student every time

The most enthusiastic hand does not represent the class. Use randomisation or pair discussion before whole-class nomination.

Overchecking — making students feel interrogated

Eight CCQs for one vocabulary item signals that language learning is a minefield. Two or three carefully chosen questions establish meaning.

ICQs after the activity has started

ICQs must come before activity onset. Stopping students mid-task to clarify instructions is disruptive.

Quick Reference

Everything on one card — for your lesson planning toolkit.

ICQ & CCQ — At a Glance

ICQ — Before Every Activity

  • What are students producing? (oral / written)
  • Solo, pairs, or groups?
  • How long?
  • What do they do first?
  • Any constraints? (no L1, no notes…)
  • Max 1–2 questions

CCQ — After Every Presentation

  • Never use the target word
  • Use simpler language than the item
  • Yes/no or short answer only
  • 2–3 questions: easy → harder
  • Target the key semantic/grammatical feature
  • Prepare in advance, not on the spot
Never Say

“Do you understand?” / “Does that make sense?” / “OK?” / “Are you ready?” — these produce compliance responses, not evidence of comprehension.

Always Instead

Ask a short, closed question whose correct answer requires genuine understanding. Wait 3–7 seconds. Nominate after waiting.

ABC English Online — Teacher Resources