Defining and Non-defining Relative Clauses
Identify people, documents and rules precisely, then add extra information without changing the main reference.
The legal situations in this unit are fictional. The modal verbs practise certainty, permission, obligation and possibility; they do not state the law of any particular jurisdiction.
By the end of this unit, you should be able to…
choose who, whom, whose, which, that, where and when;
use commas accurately and omit a pronoun only when possible;
combine and edit legal-style sentences without creating ambiguity.
One form identifies; the other adds
Before choosing a pronoun, decide whether the relative clause tells us exactly which person or thing we mean.
Defining relative clause
Essential information. It identifies the person, thing, place or time.
- Commas
- No commas
- Pronouns
- who, whom, whose, which, that, where, when
- Pronoun omission
- Possible when the pronoun is the object (not whose)
The lawyer who may chair the panel has arrived.
Non-defining relative clause
Additional information. The person, thing, place or time is already identified.
- Commas
- Use a pair, or one comma at the end of a sentence
- Pronouns
- who, whom, whose, which, where, when
- Pronoun omission
- Not possible; do not use that
Ms Borg, who may chair the panel, has arrived.
Detailed reference locked
Enter the class-reference code to reveal the full table.
Draft, test and refine
Write your own sentences. Keep the scenario fictional if you prefer. Your work saves automatically in this browser.
Six-sentence drafting brief
| Purpose | Your sentence |
|---|---|
| Identify a person who may or must act. | |
| Identify a document or rule. | |
| Add information about a named person. | |
| Add information about a known document. | |
| Comment on a whole earlier clause. | |
| Use a formal preposition pattern. |
Drafts are stored only in this browser.
Answer key locked
Enter the teacher passcode to reveal answers and explanations.
